Group Admins
Description
Session Description
Since their inception in 2008, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have generated considerable interest in the educational research community. This interest stems from the potential that these courses offer in providing flexible, affordable, and on-demand options for learning and development in a time of instant connectivity and constant change. Despite this rise in interest and research output, there are some major blind spots within this field of research that require serious attention. Early research in this area focused on categorizations of MOOCs based on their technological and pedagogical underpinnings, with this focus moving later to issues related to learners’ experiences and patterns of engagement within a MOOC (Olazabalaga, Garrido, & Ruiz, 2016). However, this shift in focus did not extend beyond learners’ experiences and engagement within a MOOC. Many researchers have pointed out the need to examine the impact these informal learning experiences have on participants’ actual practices after they participate in a MOOC and how different design factors support or hinder the transfer of knowledge and experiences gained to real-life situations (Castaño, Maiz, & Garay, 2015; Olazabalaga et al., 2016). Some studies suggest that learners do not use the knowledge they gain in MOOCs in their jobs and that improvements in MOOC design could help remedy this problem (Mathews, 2014).
Understanding what factors in MOOC design, pedagogy, and learning activities relate to the transfer of knowledge, by examining learners’ experience after they leave a course, is an important and interesting area of study. The need to fill this gap in the literature becomes even more critical given the fast pace at which knowledge, technology tools, and job roles and responsibilities are changing —which means that traditional on-the-job professional development and training are no longer sufficient in addressing professionals’ continuing need for learning and development (Littlejohn & Milligan, 2015). Unfortunately, research in the area of informal learning is still relatively limited, especially within teachers’ professional learning literature (Gijbels, Raemdonck, Vervecken, & Van Herck, 2012; Jobe, Östlund, & Svensson, 2014; Macià & García, 2016; Manuti, Pastore, Scardigno, Giancaspro, & Morciano, 2015; Tour, 2017).
The purpose of this session is to share the effectiveness of a MOOC offered on the Canvas Open Network entitled “Humanizing Online Teaching and Learning” (HumanMOOC) by exploring the impact that this informal learning experience had on learners’ teaching and learning practices after they participated in the MOOC. The HumanMOOC covered topics on the elements of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework: social presence, teaching presence and cognitive presence (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000). Our topics of inquiry were: In what ways has participating in the MOOC changed how participants perceive and enhance presence in their online courses? What factors (i.e. course design, personal, and institutional) supported or hindered the implementation of these changes in participants’ actual practice?
Session content
We asked a group of participants what they learned and how it has changed the way they teach online. In the first 15 minutes we will introduce attendees to the HumanMOOC and share our findings from our recent impact to practice study. As suggested, 5 minutes will be reserved for Q&A.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.315.4567&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Beckingham, S., Nerantzi, C., Reed, P., & Walker, D. (2015). Speedy professional conversations around learning and teaching in higher education via the brand new tweetchat# LTHEchat. ALISS Quarterly. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/9337/
Boud, D., & Hager, P. (2012). Re-thinking continuing professional development through changing metaphors and location in professional practices. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(1), 17–30. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2011.608656.
Brown, M. (2017). Trends and technologies: Teaching and learning. Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR.
Brown, M. (2018). Presenting the ELI key issues for 2018. Web log post. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2018/1/presenting-the-eli-key-issues-for-2018
Castaño, C., Maiz, I., & Garay, U. (2015). Design, motivation and performance in a cooperative MOOC course. Comunicar. Revista Cientí ca de Educación y Comunicación, 44, 19–26. http://eprints.rclis.org/24347/
Cook, M. (2016). State of the MOOC 2016: A year of massive landscape change for Massive Open Online Courses. Retrieved from http://www.onlinecoursereport.com/state-of-the-mooc-2016-a-year-of-massive-landscape-change-for-massive-open-online-courses/
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.
Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 383–412. doi:10.3102/00346543076003383.
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interactive Media in education, 2012(3). DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18.
Deloitte Insights. (2018). The rise of the social enterprise. 2018 global human capital trends report. https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/human-capital-trends.html
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Desimone, L. M. (2011). A primer on effective professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 68–71.
Eraut, M. (2000). Non‐formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 113–136.
Eraut, M. (2011). Informal learning in the workplace: Evidence on the real value of work-based learning (WBL). Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 25(5), 8–12.
Fontana, R. P., Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2015). Measuring self‐regulated learning in the workplace. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(1), 32–52. doi:10.1111/ijtd.12046.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2-3), 87-105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6.
Gast, I., Schildkamp, K., & van der Veen, J. T. (2017). Team-based professional development interventions in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 736–767. doi:10.3102/0034654317704306.
Gijbels, D., Raemdonck, I., Vervecken, D., & Van Herck, J. (2012). Understanding work-related learning: The case of ICT workers. Journal of Workplace Learning, 24(6), 416–429.
Jobe, W., Östlund, C., & Svensson, L. (2014, March). MOOCs for professional teacher development. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1580–1586). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Johnson, S. (2017). MIT moves beyond the MOOC to court companies, professional learners. Edusurge. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-10-13-mit-moves-beyond-the-mooc-to-court-companies-professional-learners?utm_content=bufferefb47&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer.
Kelly, N., & Antonio, A. (2016). Teacher peer support in social network sites. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 138–149.
Kennedy, A. (2014). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Professional Development in Education, 40(3), 336–351. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.929293.
Kilgore, W. (2016). Design of informal online communities in education (Doctoral dissertation). University of North Texas Digital Library https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc862820/
Kilgore, W., & Al-Freih, M. (2016). MOOCs as an innovative pedagogical design laboratory. International Journal on Innovations in Online Education, 1(1). Retrieved from https://onlineinnovationsjournal.com/streams/the-influence-of-social-media-on-online-education/4b9873d96241a56b.html
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 247–254.
Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: Professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 24, 29369. doi:10.3402/rlt.v24.29369.
Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003.
Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Designing MOOCs for professional learners: Tools and patterns to encourage self-regulated learning. eLearning Papers, 42(4).
Livingstone, D. W. (2001). Adults’ informal learning: Definitions, findings, gaps and future research. Working Paper no. 21. Toronto: NALL (New Approaches to Lifelong Learning).
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Parslow, P., & Williams, S. (2014). Dropout: MOOC participants’ perspective. In U. Cress & C. D. Kloos (Eds.), Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014 (EMOOCs 2014) (pp. 95-100). Lausanne, Switzerland.
Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291–307.
Manuti, A., Pastore, S., Scardigno, A. F., Giancaspro, M. L., & Morciano, D. (2015). Formal and informal learning in the workplace: A research review. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(1), 1–17. doi:10.1111/ijtd.12044.
Mathews, D. (2014, May 1). MOOC students “passive”, study suggests. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/mooc-students-passive-study-suggests/2012939.article
McConnell‐Henry, T., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2009). Husserl and Heidegger: Exploring the disparity. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 15(1), 7–15.
Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2014). Supporting professional learning in a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1855.
Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
Nerantzi, C. (2015). Who says academics don’t do CPD? Connecting practitioners and developing together through distributed cross-institutional collaborative CPD in the open. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 3(1), 98-108.
O’Brien, John. (2018). The future of Educause, Part 3: Reimagined professional learning. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2018/5/the-future-of-educause-part-3-reimagined-professional-learning?utm_source=Informz&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=ER
Olazabalaga, I. M., Garrido, C. C., & Ruiz, U. G. (2016). Research on MOOCs: Trends and methodologies. Porta Linguarum, pp. 87–98. http://www.ugr.es/~portalin/articulos/PL_monograph1_2016/art_7.pdf
Purvis, A., Rodger, H., & Beckingham, S. (2016). Engagement or distraction: The use of social media for learning in higher education. Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 5(1). Doi: 10.7190/seej.v5.i1.104.
Radford, A. W., Coningham, B., & Horn, L. (2015). MOOCs: Not just for college students—How organizations can use MOOCs for professional development. Employment Relations Today, 41(4), 1–15. doi:10.1002/ert.21469.
Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2015). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Schulz, M., & Roßnagel, C. S. (2010). Informal workplace learning: An exploration of age differences in learning competence. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 383–399.
Shah, D. (2016a). MOOC trends in 2016: MOOCs no longer massive. Class Central.Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-2015-stats/
Shah, D. (2016b). Monetization over massiveness: Breaking down MOOCs by the numbers in 2016. EdSurge. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2016-12-29-monetization-over-massiveness-breaking-down-moocs-by-the-numbers-in-2016
Sneddon, J., Barlow, G., Bradley, S., Brink, A., Chandy, S. J., & Nathwani, D. (2018). Development and impact of a massive open online course (MOOC) for antimicrobial stewardship. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 73(4), 1091–1097. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx493.
Stewart, C. (2014). Transforming professional development to professional learning. Journal of Adult Education, 43(1), 28–33.
Thacker, E. S. (2017). “PD is where teachers are learning!” High school social studies teachers’ formal and informal professional learning. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 41(1), 37–52.
Tour, E. (2017). Teachers’’personal learning networks (PLNs): Exploring the nature of self‐initiated professional learning online. Literacy, 51(1), 11–18.
